Colour selection in Lantana camara L. blooms: A study on butterfly attraction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55779/ng44236Keywords:
butterfly species, colour preference, foraging behaviour, L. camara, pollinatorsAbstract
Flower colour is a crucial factor influencing pollinator-plant interactions. Lantana camara L., a popular ornamental plant, attracts various butterfly species. The present study was conducted in Serampore, Hooghly, West Bengal, India, spanning a period of one year from June 2022 to May 2023. This study investigates the preferences of some butterfly species for flowers of a certain colour and the choice of Lantana camara flowers as nectar sources. L. camara is known for its vibrant and diverse colour variations, making it an ideal candidate for attracting various pollinators. Through field observations and controlled experiments, we aimed to identify if certain butterfly species exhibit distinct colour preferences when foraging on Lantana blooms. Our preliminary findings suggest that different butterfly species display varying degrees of colour selectivity, with some showing a preference for warm colour within the L. camara spectrum. These initial insights provide a foundation for further research into the intricate relationship between butterfly species and floral coloration. Understanding the nuanced preferences of butterflies for L. camara flowers can contribute to the development of targeted conservation and gardening practices aimed at supporting specific butterfly populations. This study offers a valuable starting point for future investigations into the broader implications of floral colour preferences in pollinator ecology.
Metrics
References
Althoff DM, Segraves KA, Johnson MT (2014). Testing for coevolutionary diversification: linking pattern with process. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29(2):82-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.11.003
Altmann J (1974). Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49(3-4):227-266.
Balamurali GS, Krishna S, Somanathan H (2015). Senses and signals: evolution of floral signals, pollinator sensory systems and the structure of plant–pollinator interactions. Current Science 108(10):1852-1861. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24905612
Benson WW, Brown JrKS, Gilbert LE (1975). Coevolution of plants and herbivores: passion flower butterflies. Evolution 29(4):659-680. https://doi.org/10.2307/2407076
Bernays EA (1998). Evolution of feeding behavior in insect herbivores. Bioscience 48(1):35-44. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313226
Boggs CL (1987). Ecology of nectar and pollen feeding in Lepidoptera. In: Slansky F, Rodriguez JC (Eds). Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, spiders and related invertebrates pp 369-391. Wiley-Interscience.
Briggs HM, Graham S, Switzer CM, Hopkins R (2018). Variation in context‐dependent foraging behavior across pollinators. Ecology and Evolution 8(16):7964-7973. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4303
Burkle LA, Alarcón R (2011). The future of plant–pollinator diversity: understanding interaction networks across time, space, and global change. American Journal of Botany 98(3):528-538. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000391
Chen G, Gong W, Ge J, Dunn BL, Sun W (2014). Inflorescence scent, color, and nectar properties of “butterfly bush” (Buddleja davidii) in its native range. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 209(3-4):172-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2014.02.003
Greenfield MD (2002). Signalers and receivers: mechanisms and evolution of arthropod communication. Oxford University Press.
Junker RR, Parachnowitsch AL (2015). Working towards a holistic view on flower traits—how floral scents mediate plant–animal interactions in concert with other floral characters. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science 95(1):43-68.
Kantsa A, Raguso RA, Dyer AG, Sgardelis SP, Olesen JM, Petanidou T (2017). Community-wide integration of floral colour and scent in a Mediterranean scrubland. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1(10):1502-1510. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0298-0
Kessler A, Chautá A (2020). The ecological consequences of herbivore-induced plant responses on plant–pollinator interactions. Emerging Topics in Life Sciences 4(1):33-43. https://doi.org/10.1042/etls20190121
Kevan PG, Baker HG (1983). Insects as flower visitors and pollinators. Annual Review of Entomology 28(1):407-453. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.28.010183.002203
Krenn HW, Zulka KP, Gatschnegg T (2001). Proboscis morphology and food preferences in nymphalid butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Journal of Zoology 254(1):17-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836901000528
Krishna S, Keasar T (2018). Morphological complexity as a floral signal: from perception by insect pollinators to co-evolutionary implications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19(6):1681. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19061681
Kunte KJ (2000). Project lifescape 5. Butterfly accounts. Resonance 5(3):86-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02839004
Mallick MAI (2023). Abundance, habitat preference and seasonal patterns of different butterfly species (Order: Lepidoptera): A preliminary study in West Bengal State University (WBSU) campus, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences 10(3):6-21.
May PG (1992). Flower selection and the dynamics of lipid reserve in two nectarivorous butterflies. Ecology 73(6):2181-2191. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941466
Narbona E, del Valle JC, Arista M, Buide ML, Ortiz PL (2021). Major flower pigments originate different colour signals to pollinators. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9:743850. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.743850
Oberrath R, Böhning-Gaese K (1999). Floral color change and the attraction of insect pollinators in lungwort (Pulmonaria collina). Oecologia 121:383-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050943
Ômura H, Honda K (2005). Priority of color over scent during flower visitation by adult Vanessa indica butterflies. Oecologia 142:588-596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1761-6
Paul I, Poddar Sarkar M, Bhadoria PBS (2022). Floral secondary metabolites in context of biotic and abiotic stress factors. Chemoecology 32(2):49-68. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00049-021-00366-0
Pywell RF, Meek WR, Hulmes L, Hulmes S, James KL, Nowakowski M, Carvell C (2011). Management to enhance pollen and nectar resources for bumblebees and butterflies within intensively farmed landscapes. Journal of Insect Conservation 15:853-864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-011-9383-x
Raguso RA (2008). Wake up and smell the roses: the ecology and evolution of floral scent. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 39(1):549-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095601
Reverté S, Retana J, Gómez JM, Bosch J (2016). Pollinators show flower colour preferences but flowers with similar colours do not attract similar pollinators. Annals of Botany 118(2):249-257. https://doi.org/10.1093%2Faob%2Fmcw103
Schiestl FP, Johnson SD (2013). Pollinator-mediated evolution of floral signals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28(5):307-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.019
Shivanna KR (2014). Biotic pollination: how plants achieve conflicting demands of attraction and restriction of potential pollinators. Reproductive Biology of Plants pp 218-267.
Smetacek P (2016). A naturalist’s guide to the butterflies of India. Prakash Books India Private Limited.
Stefanescu C, Traveset A (2009). Factors influencing the degree of generalization in flower use by Mediterranean butterflies. Oikos 118(7):1109-1117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17274.x
Strauss SY, Irwin RE (2004). Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant-animal interactions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35(1):435-466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130215
Symonds MR, Elgar MA (2008). The evolution of pheromone diversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23(4):220-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.009
Szigeti V, Kőrösi Á, Harnos A, Kis J (2018). Temporal changes in floral resource availability and flower visitation in a butterfly. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 12:177-189. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11829-017-9585-6
Tiple AD, Khurad AM, Dennis RL (2009). Adult butterfly feeding–nectar flower associations: constraints of taxonomic affiliation, butterfly, and nectar flower morphology. Journal of Natural History 43(13-14):855-884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930802610568
Wäckers FL, Romeis J, van Rijn P (2007). Nectar and pollen feeding by insect herbivores and implications for multitrophic interactions. Annual Review of Entomology 52:301-323. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091352
Wackers FL, van Rijn PCJ, Bruin J (2005). Plant-provided food for carnivorous insects: a protective mutualism and its applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Weiss MR (1991). Floral colour changes as cues for pollinators. Nature 354(6350):227-229. https://doi.org/10.1038/354227a0
Weiss MR (1997). Innate colour preferences and flexible colour learning in the pipevine swallowtail. Animal Behaviour 53(5):1043-1052. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1996.0357
Wiklund C, Åhrberg C (1978). Host plants, nectar source plants, and habitat selection of males and females of Anthocharis cardamines (Lepidoptera). Oikos 31(2):169-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3543560
Woodcock TS, Larson BM, Kevan PG, Inouye DW, Lunau K (2014). Flies and flowers II: floral attractants and rewards. Journal of Pollination Ecology 12:63-94. https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2014)5
Yoshida M, Itoh Y, Ômura H, Arikawa K, Kinoshita M (2015). Plant scents modify innate colour preference in foraging swallowtail butterflies. Biology Letters 11(7):20150390. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0390
Zariman NA, Omar NA, Huda AN (2022). Plant attractants and rewards for pollinators: Their significant to successful crop pollination. International Journal of Life Sciences and Biotechnology 5(2):270-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.38001/ijlsb.1069254
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Md. Abu Imran MALLICK, Uttam GUPTA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Distribution - Permissions - Copyright
Papers published in Nova Geodesia are Open-Access, distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
© Articles by the authors; licensee SMTCT, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright/to retain publishing rights without restriction.
License:
Open Access Journal - the journal offers free, immediate, and unrestricted access to peer-reviewed research and scholarly work, due to SMTCT support to increase the visibility, accessibility and reputation of the researchers, regardless of geography and their budgets. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
