Evaluating the performance of various models for deriving orthometricheights using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55779/ng44239

Keywords:

Global Geopotential Models, geoid, GNSS, orthometric height

Abstract

Orthometric heights are vital for fields such as topographic mapping, construction, engineering, and geophysical studies. This study examines the performance of five Global Geopotential Models (GGMs) and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data in deriving orthometric heights to determine the optimum model. Data from 21 ground control points were collected using South GNSS receivers, processed for ellipsoidal height, and compared with geoid undulations from five GGMs (EGM 2008, EIGEN-6C4, GECO, SGG-UGM-2, and XGM 2019e) to determine the orthometric heights. The derived heights were validated against existing orthometric data. The geoid models showed a high correlation (0.999), with EGM 2008, GECO, SGG-UGM-2, and XGM 2019e displaying similar standard deviations (0.06-0.07 m). EIGEN-6C4, however, was an outlier, with a higher standard deviation (SD = 4.8750 m) and lower minimum value (Min = 2.467m). Root Mean Square Errors (RMSEs) ranged between 10.92 m and 11.27 m for all models. Statistical tests, including t-tests and ANOVA, showed no significant difference between most models at a 95% confidence level, though GECO and XGM 2019e had a small, statistically significant difference. XGM 2019e was identified as the most precise model, showing a near-perfect correlation with other models with the least standard deviation.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abeho D, Hipkin R, Tulu B (2014). Evaluation of EGM2008 by means of GPS Levelling Uganda. South African Journal of Geomatics 3(3):272-284. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajg.v3i3.2

Alim Sikder MA, Wu F, Ahmed WA, Thodsan T, Zhao Y (2020). Assessment of orthometric height derived from levelling, GNSS and EGM2008 geoid model in Bangladesh. 2020 15th IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP) 689-694. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSP48669.2020.9321048

Al Shouny A, Khalil R, Kamel A, Miky Y (2023). Assessments of recent Global geopotential Models based on GPS/levelling and gravity data along coastal zones of Egypt. Open Geosciences 15(1):20220450. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0450

Barthelmes F, Köhler W (2016). The Geodesist's Handbook. Journal of Geodesy 90(10):907-1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0948-z

Featherstone WE, Dentith MC, Kirby JF (1998). Strategies for the accurate determination of orthometric heights from GPS. Survey Review 34(267):278-296. https://doi.org/10.1179/sre.1998.34.267.278

Ferreira VG, Zhang Y, de Freitas SRC (2013). Validation of GOCE gravity field models using GPS-leveling data and EGM08: A case study in Brazil. Journal of Geodetic Science 3(3):209-218. https://doi.org/10.2478/jogs-2013-0027

Förste C, Bruinsma SL, Abrikosov O, Lemoine JM, Marty JC, Flechtner F, Balmino G, Barthelmes F, Bian CR (2014). EIGEN-6C4 Te latest combined global gravity field model including GOCE data up to degree and order 2190 of GFZ Potsdam and GRGS Toulouse. GFZ Data Services.

Gilardoni M, Reguzzoni M, Sampietro D (2016). GECO: A global gravity model by locally combining GOCE data and EGM2008. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica 60(2):228-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-015-1114-4

Heiskanen W, Moritz H (1967). Physical Geodesy. London: Freeman WH and Company.

Hoffman-Wellenhof B, Moritz J (2000). Physical Geodesy. Wien, New York: Springer.

Kostelecký J, Klokočník J, Bucha B, Bezděk A, Förste C (2015). Evaluation of gravity field model EIGEN-6C4 by means of various functions of gravity potential, and by GNSS/levelling. Geoinformatics FCE CTU 14(1):7-28. https://doi.org/10.14311/gi.14.1.1

Liang W, Li J, Xu X, Zhang S, Zhao Y (2020). A high-resolution earth’s gravity field Model SGG-UGM-2 from GOCE, GRACE, Satellite Altimetry, and EGM2008. Engineering 6(8):860-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.05.008

Odera PA, Fukuda Y (2015). Comparison of Helmert and rigorous orthometric heights over Japan. Earth, Planets and Space, 67(1):27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0194-2

Odumosu JO, Ajayi OG, Idowu FF, Adesina EA (2015). Evaluation of the various orthometric height systems and the Nigerian scenario – A case study of Lagos State. Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences 30(1):46-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2015.09.002

Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2012). The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 117: B04406. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008916

Sjöberg LE, Gidudu A, Ssengendo R (2015). The Uganda Gravimetric Geoid Model 2014 computed by the KTH Method. Journal of Geodetic Science 5(1):35-46. https://doi.org/10.1515/jogs-2015-0007

Tata H (2024). Insight into the Global Gravity Models for Free Insight into the Global Gravity Models for Free-Air Gravity Gravity Estimation using Land Gravity Data. Nova Geodesia 4(2):180. https://doi.org/10.55779/ng42180

Tata H, Eteje SO (2021). Determination of orthometric heights of points using Gravimetric/GPS and Geodetic Levelling Approaches. Indian Journal of Engineering 18(49):134-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4764951

Tata H, Olatunji OR (2021). Determination of orthometric height using GNSS and EGM data: A scenario of the Federal University of Technology Akure. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 8(1):100-105.

Tata H, Ono MN (2018). A geometric approach for determination of geoidal height in Akure Environs, Ondo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 8(8):668-677. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.8.8.2018.p8084

Zingerle P, Pail R, Gruber T, Oikonomidou X (2020). The combined global gravity field model XGM2019e. Journal of Geodesy 94(7):66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01398-0

Downloads

Published

2024-12-04

How to Cite

TATA, H., & OLAOYE, C. A. (2024). Evaluating the performance of various models for deriving orthometricheights using Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data. Nova Geodesia, 4(4), 239. https://doi.org/10.55779/ng44239

Issue

Section

Research articles